putain ouais! jean-luc godard

Derrida is the problem.  ‘deconstruction’ is unnecessary, extraneous, even invasive.  we do not want deconstruction.  we want reconstruction.  deconstruction allows the ‘cadre’ to ‘climb’ and export its own signifier.  thus, it can make a scapegoat—of the lower and middle classes, any that suit its purpose?—and go on about its selfish business of debasing our lives.  this is despicable, it erases the surfaces (‘deterritorializes’—and, as we should know if we’ve actually read our Deleuze: with every deterritorialization, a reterritorialization, a ‘subjective redeployment’…in whose favor? I ask; in whose favor?), removes all indicators, leads to inevitable, ineradicably escalated confusion.

deconstruction—the impetus, the drive for it—is like a spectre over all of our attempts at solidarity, at reconstruction.  who has begun the process?  think of it, be truthful with yourself:  was it you?  was it really you?  …to ask this, you will have to ask (at least partially) why?

or are you merely ‘the first person to be sent by television’?  …’the [nth] first person to be sent by television’?

thus, Sadism…it’s inevitable if we leave ourselves unquestioned, unscrutinized by the Other.  we are programmed Sadistic.  we are overcoded with the ‘legacy’ of Nazi Germany, of Sadistic fascism.